Last updated: 06 October 2010
Published in:
Creating new digital media |
Tags:
audio |
audio editing |
sound recordings |
teaching |
This paper presents an introduction to audio feedback as a tool in teaching and learning in FE/HE. Drawing on previous research and case studies in the field, this paper discusses models of audio feedback and the potential of using audio over other methods of delivering feedback, as well as any notable drawbacks.
The use of audio feedback raises some initial questions which this paper aims to answer:
According to the National Student Survey (HEFCE, 2007) student feedback from tutors and assessors impacts heavily on student satisfaction.
Some research into the effects of student feedback on their development has brought up themes of staff effort gone to waste and students not digesting feedback, therefore hindering their development (Hartley and Skelton, 2002). As a result numerous case studies have investigated the potential for successful audio feedback to be an improvement on written feedback in the perception of students and assessors.
Themes that have been mentioned throughout these case studies, that help define this improvement include:
Although a number of research papers have been published on the benefits of audio feedback, the concept is still in its infancy.
Audio feedback can be presented and delivered in a variety of ways. To keep things simple the types of audio feedback can be divided into three main categories.
Based on (Chiang, 2009)
Choosing one of these types of feedback will generally depend on two things, the level of time and technical involvement you wish to embark in, and the suitability for the type of assessment and the needs of the student. Audio feedback does not have to be delivered in the traditional one-to-one feedback interaction, in fact studies have shown that audio feedback given by more than one assessor and for more than one student at a time in group work scenarios has proved successful (Emery, R and Atkinson, A, 2009).
The obvious difference in providing audio feedback over written feedback is the extra time involved in the practices around speaking the words. Simple editing perhaps, rendering of files and delivery all add extra time over composing written notes and the traditional method of returning work with feedback to students.
A final report of the JISC-funded Sounds Good project found that feedback could be made quicker compared to written feedback in circumstances where;
(Rotherham, B. 2008)
Surprisingly, very little. You will however need the following equipment.
* encoding means converting your recordings into deliverable file types such as MP3.
If you plan on creating Asynchronous Audio-Visual feedback (see above), then programs such as word will allow you to record directly and will negate the need for any editing or transcoding.
For advice on how to create audio feedback please read advice the document Audio Feedback - A How-To Guide which gives step-by-step instructions on creating audio feedback within Microsoft Word documents.
Audacity is a recommended program which is freely downloadable and performs basic recording editing and transcoding. Our advice document Creating an Audio Podcast contains instructions on recording and editing using Audacity.
Here are a few tips and general rules worth noting when producing digital audio files for audio feedback.
There are a number of ways to deliver digital audio files to students but the two most important concerns are privacy and simplicity. Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) can provide a safe and easy to access platform acting as a virtual interface between staff and students. Always check the privacy settings thoroughly before uploading any student feedback files.
For further advice, please read our Audio Feedback - A How-To Guide which offers a practical, simple to follow set of instructions for creating audio feedback files, and delivering them to students in MS Word.
Chaing, Dr. I-Chant Andrea (2009). Which Audio Feedback is best?: Optimising audio feedback to maximise student and staff experience. Aberystwyth University
Bunyan, N, King, D & McGugan, S (2008). Does it make a difference? Replacing text with audio feedback. Practice and Evidence of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Vol. 3, No.2, pp. 125 - 163
Merry, S & Orsmond, P (2007) Students' Attitudes to and Usage of Academic Feedback Provided Via Audio Files. Bioscience Education ejournal, Vol. 11.
Rotherham, B. (2008) Sounds Good: Quicker, better assessment using audio feedback. A JISC funded project, Jan - July 2008. http://jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/programme_users_and_innovation/soundsgood.aspx
Last updated: 06 October 2010
Published in:
Creating new digital media |
Tags:
audio |
audio editing |
sound recordings |
teaching |
We provide a FREE enquiry service giving advice to the UK Further and Higher Education community.
You can ask us anything, typical questions include - "What formats should I use?" "How do I...?" "What tools can achieve the result I need?" "What is new and emerging?"
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++